From d4c7544002db32dedbb162b2b89e655ac437ab08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:20 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 01/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_hi{gh}_lo{w}() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_hi{gh}_lo{w}() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index c3c5bc94fab0..7c631fd8abe2 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -123,3 +123,45 @@ e << str_false_true_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_false_true(%s)" % e) + +@str_hi_lo depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +( +- ((E) ? "hi" : "lo") ++ str_hi_lo(E) +) + +@str_hi_lo_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +( +* ((E@P) ? "hi" : "lo") +) + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_hi_lo_r.P; +e << str_hi_lo_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_hi_lo(%s)" % e) + +@str_high_low depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "high" : "low") ++ str_high_low(E) + +@str_high_low_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "high" : "low") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_high_low_r.P; +e << str_high_low_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_high_low(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From 5b7ca4507d64de729011c145d8ee9a2731f9502f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 02/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_lo{w}_hi{gh}() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_lo{w}_hi{gh}() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 7c631fd8abe2..e91d4eb30161 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -165,3 +165,41 @@ e << str_high_low_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_high_low(%s)" % e) + +@str_lo_hi depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "lo" : "hi") ++ str_lo_hi(E) + +@str_lo_hi_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "lo" : "hi") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_lo_hi_r.P; +e << str_lo_hi_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_lo_hi(%s)" % e) + +@str_low_high depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "low" : "high") ++ str_low_high(E) + +@str_low_high_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "low" : "high") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_low_high_r.P; +e << str_low_high_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_low_high(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From dd2275d349c2f02ceb6cd37f89b8b9920c602488 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 03/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_enable{d}_disable{d}() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_enable{d}_ disable{d}() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index e91d4eb30161..bb6b851ee2aa 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -203,3 +203,41 @@ e << str_low_high_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_low_high(%s)" % e) + +@str_enable_disable depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "enable" : "disable") ++ str_enable_disable(E) + +@str_enable_disable_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "enable" : "disable") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_enable_disable_r.P; +e << str_enable_disable_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_enable_disable(%s)" % e) + +@str_enabled_disabled depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "enabled" : "disabled") ++ str_enabled_disabled(E) + +@str_enabled_disabled_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "enabled" : "disabled") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_enabled_disabled_r.P; +e << str_enabled_disabled_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_enabled_disabled(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From ba4b514a6f4ac420d872b8f16245e3ffa05c10a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 04/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_read_write() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_read_write() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index bb6b851ee2aa..29c507d86ffd 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -241,3 +241,22 @@ e << str_enabled_disabled_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_enabled_disabled(%s)" % e) + +@str_read_write depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "read" : "write") ++ str_read_write(E) + +@str_read_write_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "read" : "write") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_read_write_r.P; +e << str_read_write_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_read_write(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From c81ca023c30691dcae543bd770e7a3a4c63263ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 05/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_write_read() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_write_read() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 29c507d86ffd..64f04da2e9f4 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -260,3 +260,22 @@ e << str_read_write_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_read_write(%s)" % e) + +@str_write_read depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "write" : "read") ++ str_write_read(E) + +@str_write_read_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "write" : "read") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_write_read_r.P; +e << str_write_read_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_write_read(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From 9b5b4810559d3716aef9fdc8d555e4db1a031749 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:25 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 06/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_on_off() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_on_off() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 64f04da2e9f4..34ff8f48965c 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -279,3 +279,22 @@ e << str_write_read_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_write_read(%s)" % e) + +@str_on_off depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "on" : "off") ++ str_on_off(E) + +@str_on_off_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "on" : "off") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_on_off_r.P; +e << str_on_off_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_on_off(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From 253244cdf16a755039f9078b0a785176712f2584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:26 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 07/16] coccinelle: Add rules to find str_yes_no() replacements As other rules done, we add rules for str_yes_no() to check the relative opportunities. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 34ff8f48965c..96dc7090395d 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -298,3 +298,22 @@ e << str_on_off_r.E; @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_on_off(%s)" % e) + +@str_yes_no depends on patch@ +expression E; +@@ +- ((E) ? "yes" : "no") ++ str_yes_no(E) + +@str_yes_no_r depends on !patch exists@ +expression E; +position P; +@@ +* ((E@P) ? "yes" : "no") + +@script:python depends on report@ +p << str_yes_no_r.P; +e << str_yes_no_r.E; +@@ + +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_yes_no(%s)" % e) -- 2.51.0 From f584e3752ca7bb1f8849a85816b3c974f1aa67ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongbo Li Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:09:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 08/16] coccinelle: Remove unnecessary parentheses for only one possible change. The parentheses are only needed if there is a disjunction, ie a set of possible changes. If there is only one pattern, we can remove these parentheses. Just like the format: - x + y not: ( - x + y ) Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 96dc7090395d..95e9a3b31f86 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -43,18 +43,14 @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_plural(%s)" % e) @str_up_down depends on patch@ expression E; @@ -( - ((E) ? "up" : "down") + str_up_down(E) -) @str_up_down_r depends on !patch exists@ expression E; position P; @@ -( * ((E@P) ? "up" : "down") -) @script:python depends on report@ p << str_up_down_r.P; @@ -66,18 +62,14 @@ coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_up_down(%s)" % e) @str_down_up depends on patch@ expression E; @@ -( - ((E) ? "down" : "up") + str_down_up(E) -) @str_down_up_r depends on !patch exists@ expression E; position P; @@ -( * ((E@P) ? "down" : "up") -) @script:python depends on report@ p << str_down_up_r.P; -- 2.51.0 From 4003ba664bd16f5a969cc883295a9eb5a5aef19e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lawall Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 21:26:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 09/16] Reduce Coccinelle choices in string_choices.cocci The isomorphism neg_if_exp negates the test of a ?: conditional, making it unnecessary to have an explicit case for a negated test with the branches inverted. At the same time, we can disable neg_if_exp in cases where a different API function may be more suitable for a negated test. Finally, in the non-patch cases, E matches an expression with parentheses around it, so there is no need to mention () explicitly in the pattern. The () are still needed in the patch cases, because we want to drop them, if they are present. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall --- scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci | 91 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci index 95e9a3b31f86..375045086912 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/string_choices.cocci @@ -14,23 +14,18 @@ expression E; - ((E == 1) ? "" : "s") + str_plural(E) | -- ((E != 1) ? "s" : "") -+ str_plural(E) -| - ((E > 1) ? "s" : "") + str_plural(E) ) -@str_plural_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_plural_r depends on !patch@ expression E; position P; @@ ( -* ((E@P == 1) ? "" : "s") +* (E@P == 1) ? "" : "s" | -* ((E@P != 1) ? "s" : "") -| -* ((E@P > 1) ? "s" : "") +* (E@P > 1) ? "s" : "" ) @script:python depends on report@ @@ -40,17 +35,17 @@ e << str_plural_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_plural(%s)" % e) -@str_up_down depends on patch@ +@str_up_down depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "up" : "down") + str_up_down(E) -@str_up_down_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_up_down_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "up" : "down") +* E@P ? "up" : "down" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_up_down_r.P; @@ -59,17 +54,17 @@ e << str_up_down_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_up_down(%s)" % e) -@str_down_up depends on patch@ +@str_down_up depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "down" : "up") + str_down_up(E) -@str_down_up_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_down_up_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "down" : "up") +* E@P ? "down" : "up" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_down_up_r.P; @@ -78,17 +73,17 @@ e << str_down_up_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_down_up(%s)" % e) -@str_true_false depends on patch@ +@str_true_false depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "true" : "false") + str_true_false(E) -@str_true_false_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_true_false_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "true" : "false") +* E@P ? "true" : "false" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_true_false_r.P; @@ -97,17 +92,17 @@ e << str_true_false_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_true_false(%s)" % e) -@str_false_true depends on patch@ +@str_false_true depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "false" : "true") + str_false_true(E) -@str_false_true_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_false_true_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "false" : "true") +* E@P ? "false" : "true" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_false_true_r.P; @@ -116,21 +111,17 @@ e << str_false_true_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_false_true(%s)" % e) -@str_hi_lo depends on patch@ +@str_hi_lo depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ -( - ((E) ? "hi" : "lo") + str_hi_lo(E) -) -@str_hi_lo_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_hi_lo_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -( -* ((E@P) ? "hi" : "lo") -) +* E@P ? "hi" : "lo" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_hi_lo_r.P; @@ -139,17 +130,17 @@ e << str_hi_lo_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_hi_lo(%s)" % e) -@str_high_low depends on patch@ +@str_high_low depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "high" : "low") + str_high_low(E) -@str_high_low_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_high_low_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "high" : "low") +* E@P ? "high" : "low" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_high_low_r.P; @@ -158,17 +149,17 @@ e << str_high_low_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_high_low(%s)" % e) -@str_lo_hi depends on patch@ +@str_lo_hi depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "lo" : "hi") + str_lo_hi(E) -@str_lo_hi_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_lo_hi_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "lo" : "hi") +* E@P ? "lo" : "hi" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_lo_hi_r.P; @@ -177,17 +168,17 @@ e << str_lo_hi_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_lo_hi(%s)" % e) -@str_low_high depends on patch@ +@str_low_high depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "low" : "high") + str_low_high(E) -@str_low_high_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_low_high_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "low" : "high") +* E@P ? "low" : "high" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_low_high_r.P; @@ -202,11 +193,11 @@ expression E; - ((E) ? "enable" : "disable") + str_enable_disable(E) -@str_enable_disable_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_enable_disable_r depends on !patch@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "enable" : "disable") +* E@P ? "enable" : "disable" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_enable_disable_r.P; @@ -221,11 +212,11 @@ expression E; - ((E) ? "enabled" : "disabled") + str_enabled_disabled(E) -@str_enabled_disabled_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_enabled_disabled_r depends on !patch@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "enabled" : "disabled") +* E@P ? "enabled" : "disabled" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_enabled_disabled_r.P; @@ -234,17 +225,17 @@ e << str_enabled_disabled_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_enabled_disabled(%s)" % e) -@str_read_write depends on patch@ +@str_read_write depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "read" : "write") + str_read_write(E) -@str_read_write_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_read_write_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "read" : "write") +* E@P ? "read" : "write" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_read_write_r.P; @@ -253,17 +244,17 @@ e << str_read_write_r.E; coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "opportunity for str_read_write(%s)" % e) -@str_write_read depends on patch@ +@str_write_read depends on patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; @@ - ((E) ? "write" : "read") + str_write_read(E) -@str_write_read_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_write_read_r depends on !patch disable neg_if_exp@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "write" : "read") +* E@P ? "write" : "read" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_write_read_r.P; @@ -278,11 +269,11 @@ expression E; - ((E) ? "on" : "off") + str_on_off(E) -@str_on_off_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_on_off_r depends on !patch@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "on" : "off") +* E@P ? "on" : "off" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_on_off_r.P; @@ -297,11 +288,11 @@ expression E; - ((E) ? "yes" : "no") + str_yes_no(E) -@str_yes_no_r depends on !patch exists@ +@str_yes_no_r depends on !patch@ expression E; position P; @@ -* ((E@P) ? "yes" : "no") +* E@P ? "yes" : "no" @script:python depends on report@ p << str_yes_no_r.P; -- 2.51.0 From 3f749befb0998472470d850b11b430477c0718cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:47:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 10/16] x86: kvm: fix build error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback() function is used unconditionally by the x86 kvm code, but it is declared (and defined) conditionally: #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_AMD) void cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback); ... leading to a build error when neither KVM_INTEL nor KVM_AMD support is enabled: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_enable_virtualization’: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:12517:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 12517 | cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback(kvm_x86_ops.emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_disable_virtualization’: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:12522:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_emergency_unregister_virt_callback’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 12522 | cpu_emergency_unregister_virt_callback(kvm_x86_ops.emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fix the build by defining empty helper functions the same way the old cpu_emergency_disable_virtualization() function was dealt with for the same situation. Maybe we could instead have made the call sites conditional, since the callers (kvm_arch_{en,dis}able_virtualization()) have an empty weak fallback. I'll leave that to the kvm people to argue about, this at least gets the build going for that particular config. Fixes: 590b09b1d88e ("KVM: x86: Register "emergency disable" callbacks when virt is enabled") Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Sean Christopherson Cc: Kai Huang Cc: Chao Gao Cc: Farrah Chen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h index d0ef2a678d66..c02183d3cdd7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ void cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback); void cpu_emergency_unregister_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback); void cpu_emergency_disable_virtualization(void); #else +static inline void cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback) {} +static inline void cpu_emergency_unregister_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback) {} static inline void cpu_emergency_disable_virtualization(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTEL || CONFIG_KVM_AMD */ -- 2.51.0 From 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:06:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 11/16] Linux 6.12-rc1 --- Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 265dd990a9b6..187a4ce2728e 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 VERSION = 6 -PATCHLEVEL = 11 +PATCHLEVEL = 12 SUBLEVEL = 0 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION = -rc1 NAME = Baby Opossum Posse # *DOCUMENTATION* -- 2.51.0 From 2f39bba3b4f037d6c3c9174eed5befcef1c79abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:48:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix rt5651 compatible value on rk3399-eaidk-610 There are no DT bindings and driver support for a "rockchip,rt5651" codec. Replace "rockchip,rt5651" by "realtek,rt5651", which matches the "simple-audio-card,name" property in the "rt5651-sound" node. Fixes: 904f983256fdd24b ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add dts for a rk3399 based board EAIDK-610") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a9877b8b1bd0de279d2ec8294d5be14587203a82.1727358193.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-eaidk-610.dts | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-eaidk-610.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-eaidk-610.dts index 1489eb32e266..4feb78797982 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-eaidk-610.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-eaidk-610.dts @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ status = "okay"; rt5651: audio-codec@1a { - compatible = "rockchip,rt5651"; + compatible = "realtek,rt5651"; reg = <0x1a>; clocks = <&cru SCLK_I2S_8CH_OUT>; clock-names = "mclk"; -- 2.51.0 From 577b5761679da90e691acc939ebbe7879fff5f31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:48:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 13/16] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix rt5651 compatible value on rk3399-sapphire-excavator There are no DT bindings and driver support for a "rockchip,rt5651" codec. Replace "rockchip,rt5651" by "realtek,rt5651", which matches the "simple-audio-card,name" property in the "rt5651-sound" node. Fixes: 0a3c78e251b3a266 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3399 excavator main board") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/abc6c89811b3911785601d6d590483eacb145102.1727358193.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts index dbec2b7173a0..31ea3d0182c0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ status = "okay"; rt5651: rt5651@1a { - compatible = "rockchip,rt5651"; + compatible = "realtek,rt5651"; reg = <0x1a>; clocks = <&cru SCLK_I2S_8CH_OUT>; clock-names = "mclk"; -- 2.51.0 From df5f6f2f62b9b50cef78f32909485b00fc7cf7f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:29:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 14/16] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move L3 cache outside CPUs in RK3588(S) SoC dtsi Move the "l3_cache" node outside the "cpus" node in the base dtsi file for Rockchip RK3588(S) SoCs. The A55 and A76 CPU cores in these SoCs belong to the ARM DynamIQ IP core lineup, which places the L3 cache outside the CPUs and into the DynamIQ Shared Unit (DSU). [1] Thus, moving the L3 cache DT node one level higher in the DT improves the way the physical topology of the RK3588(S) SoCs is represented in the SoC dtsi files. While there, add a comment that explains it briefly, to save curious readers from the need to reference the repository log for a clarification. [1] ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit revision r4p0 TRM, version 0400-02 Fixes: c9211fa2602b ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC") Helped-by: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/84264d0713fb51ae2b9b731e28fc14681beea853.1727345965.git.dsimic@manjaro.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi index d97d84b88837..fc67585b64b7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi @@ -337,15 +337,19 @@ cache-unified; next-level-cache = <&l3_cache>; }; + }; - l3_cache: l3-cache { - compatible = "cache"; - cache-size = <3145728>; - cache-line-size = <64>; - cache-sets = <4096>; - cache-level = <3>; - cache-unified; - }; + /* + * The L3 cache belongs to the DynamIQ Shared Unit (DSU), + * so it's represented here, outside the "cpus" node + */ + l3_cache: l3-cache { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-size = <3145728>; + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <4096>; + cache-level = <3>; + cache-unified; }; display_subsystem: display-subsystem { -- 2.51.0 From 6be82067254cba14f7b9ca00613bdb7caac9501f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:39:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 15/16] arm64: dts: rockchip: Start cooling maps numbering from zero on ROCK 5B The package cooling maps for the Radxa ROCK 5B were mistakenly named map1 and map2. Their numbering should start from zero instead, because there are no package cooling maps defined in the parent RK3588 SoC dtsi file, so let's rename these cooling maps to map0 and map1. Fixes: 4a152231b050 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: enable automatic fan control on Rock 5B") Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/335ecd5841ab55f333e17bb391d0e1264fac257b.1726954592.git.dsimic@manjaro.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts index 966bbc582d89..6bd06e46a101 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts @@ -304,12 +304,12 @@ }; cooling-maps { - map1 { + map0 { trip = <&package_fan0>; cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>; }; - map2 { + map1 { trip = <&package_fan1>; cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; }; -- 2.51.0 From 875ea82c75f56697fa500f30fabaa49f82f9b229 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Edwards Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 16/16] arm64: dts: rockchip: Designate Turing RK1's system power controller Currently, the Turing RK1 board reboots when told to power off. Resolve this by designating the RK806 as the system power controller, so that the relevant driver can handle system shutdown requests. Fixes: 2806a69f3fef ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support") Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240912180148.205957-1-CFSworks@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi index dbaa94ca69f4..432133251e31 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_pins>, <&rk806_dvs1_null>, <&rk806_dvs2_null>, <&rk806_dvs3_null>; + system-power-controller; vcc1-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>; vcc2-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>; -- 2.51.0