From c11ace14d9db3a2e2e7b473ff8f79c7b1c998191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimir Oltean Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:52:48 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: use "extack" as argument to flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check() We already have an "extack" stack variable in dsa_user_add_cls_matchall_police() and dsa_user_add_cls_matchall_mirred(), there is no need to retrieve it again from cls->common.extack. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241023135251.1752488-4-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/dsa/user.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/dsa/user.c b/net/dsa/user.c index 15f69fa6a38ba..a89425a8de2e5 100644 --- a/net/dsa/user.c +++ b/net/dsa/user.c @@ -1382,8 +1382,7 @@ dsa_user_add_cls_matchall_mirred(struct net_device *dev, if (!ds->ops->port_mirror_add) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action, - cls->common.extack)) + if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action, extack)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0]; @@ -1449,8 +1448,7 @@ dsa_user_add_cls_matchall_police(struct net_device *dev, return -EOPNOTSUPP; } - if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action, - cls->common.extack)) + if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action, extack)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; list_for_each_entry(mall_tc_entry, &p->mall_tc_list, list) { -- 2.50.1