From 928b4de66ed3b0d9a6f201ce41ab2eed6ea2e7ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:52:36 +0930 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not assume the full page range is not dirty in extent_writepage_io() The function extent_writepage_io() will submit the dirty sectors inside the page for the write. But recently to co-operate with the incoming subpage compression enhancement, a new bitmap is introduced to btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap, to only avoid a subset of the dirty range. This is because we can have the following cases with 64K page size: 0 16K 32K 48K 64K | |/////////| |/| 52K For range [16K, 32K), we queue the dirty range for compression, which is ran in a delayed workqueue. Then for range [48K, 52K), we go through the regular submission path. In that case, our btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap will exclude the range [16K, 32K). The dirty flags for the range [16K, 32K) is only cleared when the compression is done, by the extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() call inside submit_one_async_extent(). This patch fix the false alert by removing the btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() check, since it's no longer correct for subpage compression cases. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 7620d335f1ec..e5075b95cfd9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -1391,8 +1391,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int extent_writepage_io(struct btrfs_inode *inode, goto out; submitted_io = true; } - - btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty(fs_info, folio, start, len); out: /* * If we didn't submitted any sector (>= i_size), folio dirty get -- 2.50.1