From 88f931ceb457903e72778e1bca06f3a37c584a7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Imre Deak Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 20:01:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/pps: Let calling intel_pps_vdd_{on, off}_unlocked() w/o PPS lock held After a follow-up change on non-eDP outputs intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}_unlocked() can be called without the PPS lock held, allow for this. Suggested-by: Jani Nikula Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250324180145.142884-2-imre.deak@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c index 6a92acfa1634a..b9b3b2803e854 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c @@ -744,11 +744,11 @@ bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) i915_reg_t pp_stat_reg, pp_ctrl_reg; bool need_to_disable = !intel_dp->pps.want_panel_vdd; - lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex); - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) return false; + lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex); + cancel_delayed_work(&intel_dp->pps.panel_vdd_work); intel_dp->pps.want_panel_vdd = true; @@ -925,11 +925,11 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync) { struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp); - lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex); - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) return; + lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex); + INTEL_DISPLAY_STATE_WARN(display, !intel_dp->pps.want_panel_vdd, "[ENCODER:%d:%s] %s VDD not forced on", dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.base.id, -- 2.50.1