From 63b7af49496d0e32f7a748b6af3361ec138b1bd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kang Yang Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:05:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: add srng->lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng->lock to protect srng data. For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng->lock. So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur: RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] Call Trace: ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k] ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k] ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k] __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319 So add srng->lock for them to avoid such warnings. Inorder to fetch the srng->lock, should change srng's definition from 'void' to 'struct hal_srng'. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx(). Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices") Signed-off-by: Kang Yang Acked-by: Jeff Johnson Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219110531.2096-3-quic_kangyang@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c index d010b25b8503f..f2bdbac2a0b7f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c @@ -5137,7 +5137,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, struct ath11k_mon_data *pmon = (struct ath11k_mon_data *)&dp->mon_data; const struct ath11k_hw_hal_params *hal_params; void *ring_entry; - void *mon_dst_srng; + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; u32 ppdu_id; u32 rx_bufs_used; u32 ring_id; @@ -5154,6 +5154,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, spin_lock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); ppdu_id = pmon->mon_ppdu_info.ppdu_id; @@ -5212,6 +5213,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, mon_dst_srng); } ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); @@ -5601,7 +5603,7 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, struct hal_sw_mon_ring_entries *sw_mon_entries; struct ath11k_pdev_mon_stats *rx_mon_stats; struct sk_buff *head_msdu, *tail_msdu; - void *mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; void *ring_entry; u32 rx_bufs_used = 0, mpdu_rx_bufs_used; int quota = 0, ret; @@ -5617,6 +5619,9 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, goto reap_status_ring; } + mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); + ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); while ((ring_entry = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng))) { head_msdu = NULL; @@ -5660,6 +5665,7 @@ next_entry: } ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); if (rx_bufs_used) { -- 2.50.1