From 5599315eea434dc7f50d895b46b7934037b84d2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baoquan He Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:27:14 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/swap: rename swap_is_has_cache() to swap_only_has_cache() There are two predicates in the name of swap_is_has_cache() which is confusing. Renaming it to remove the confusion and can better reflect its functionality. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250205092721.9395-6-bhe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Baoquan He Cc: Chris Li Cc: Kairui Song Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index 0a0c4118759e..0a9c1efeffd6 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static long swap_usage_in_pages(struct swap_info_struct *si) /* Reclaim directly, bypass the slot cache and don't touch device lock */ #define TTRS_DIRECT 0x8 -static bool swap_is_has_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si, +static bool swap_only_has_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset, int nr_pages) { unsigned char *map = si->swap_map + offset; @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si, * reference or pending writeback, and can't be allocated to others. */ ci = lock_cluster(si, offset); - need_reclaim = swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages); + need_reclaim = swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages); unlock_cluster(ci); if (!need_reclaim) goto out_unlock; @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) return; ci = lock_cluster(si, offset); - if (swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, size)) + if (swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, size)) swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, entry, size); else { for (int i = 0; i < size; i++, entry.val++) { -- 2.50.1