From 08d14d90a42a96f409ef3bb1fd073ca0a6bace27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kent Overstreet Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 12:33:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED -> BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE We're going to be speeding up snapshot deletion, by only having it process the extents/dirents/xattrs btrees if an inode of a given snapshot ID was present. This raises the possibility of 'bkey_in_missing_snapshot' errors popping up, if we ever accidentally don't do the corresponding inode update, or if the new algorithm has bugs. So we'll want to be able to differentiate more definitively between 'snapshot went missing' (and perhaps needs to be reconstructed), and 'key in snapshot that was deleted'. So instead of deleting snapshot IDs, we'll be adding a new deleted flag and leaving them permanently. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- fs/bcachefs/snapshot.c | 12 ++++++------ fs/bcachefs/snapshot_format.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/snapshot.c b/fs/bcachefs/snapshot.c index f133704d50a2..87c8aead8610 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/snapshot.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/snapshot.c @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ void bch2_snapshot_to_text(struct printbuf *out, struct bch_fs *c, prt_printf(out, "is_subvol %llu deleted %llu parent %10u children %10u %10u subvol %u tree %u", BCH_SNAPSHOT_SUBVOL(s.v), - BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(s.v), + BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(s.v), le32_to_cpu(s.v->parent), le32_to_cpu(s.v->children[0]), le32_to_cpu(s.v->children[1]), @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int __bch2_mark_snapshot(struct btree_trans *trans, parent - id - 1 < IS_ANCESTOR_BITMAP) __set_bit(parent - id - 1, t->is_ancestor); - if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(s.v)) { + if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(s.v)) { set_bit(BCH_FS_need_delete_dead_snapshots, &c->flags); if (c->curr_recovery_pass > BCH_RECOVERY_PASS_delete_dead_snapshots) bch2_delete_dead_snapshots_async(c); @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static int check_snapshot(struct btree_trans *trans, } bool should_have_subvol = BCH_SNAPSHOT_SUBVOL(&s) && - !BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(&s); + !BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(&s); if (should_have_subvol) { id = le32_to_cpu(s.subvol); @@ -1062,10 +1062,10 @@ int bch2_snapshot_node_set_deleted(struct btree_trans *trans, u32 id) } /* already deleted? */ - if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(&s->v)) + if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(&s->v)) goto err; - SET_BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(&s->v, true); + SET_BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(&s->v, true); SET_BCH_SNAPSHOT_SUBVOL(&s->v, false); s->v.subvol = 0; err: @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ static int bch2_check_snapshot_needs_deletion(struct btree_trans *trans, struct return 0; struct bkey_s_c_snapshot snap = bkey_s_c_to_snapshot(k); - if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED(snap.v) || + if (BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE(snap.v) || interior_snapshot_needs_delete(snap)) set_bit(BCH_FS_need_delete_dead_snapshots, &trans->c->flags); diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/snapshot_format.h b/fs/bcachefs/snapshot_format.h index aabcd3a74cd9..685a9fe209ab 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/snapshot_format.h +++ b/fs/bcachefs/snapshot_format.h @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct bch_snapshot { bch_le128 btime; }; -LE32_BITMASK(BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED, struct bch_snapshot, flags, 0, 1) +LE32_BITMASK(BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE, struct bch_snapshot, flags, 0, 1) /* True if a subvolume points to this snapshot node: */ LE32_BITMASK(BCH_SNAPSHOT_SUBVOL, struct bch_snapshot, flags, 1, 2) -- 2.50.1