From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:52:04 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: we're still using SCSI layout on NVMe
X-Git-Tag: draft-hellwig-nfsv4-scsi-layout-nvme-03~8
X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eab3c9c0a14beaade3b57d12380e4bb80effd097;p=users%2Fhch%2Fscsi-layout-nvme.git

we're still using SCSI layout on NVMe
---

diff --git a/scsi_nvme_middle.xml b/scsi_nvme_middle.xml
index a7a5454..86ff223 100644
--- a/scsi_nvme_middle.xml
+++ b/scsi_nvme_middle.xml
@@ -267,7 +267,8 @@
     correspondences between these security layers. In environments
     where the security requirements are such that client-side
     protection from access to storage outside of the layout is not
-    sufficient, pNFS with a NVMe layout SHOULD NOT be deployed.
+    sufficient, pNFS with a SCSI layout on a NVMe namespace SHOULD
+    NOT be deployed.
   </t>
   <t>
     As with other block-oriented pNFS layout types, the metadata