From: Thomas Weißschuh Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:36:18 +0000 (+0200) Subject: tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e7b28f2516a6aec54e2aa1485e4806e8d8431815;p=users%2Fjedix%2Flinux-maple.git tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number All symbols created by nolibc are also visible to user code. Syscall constants are expected to come from the kernel headers and should not be made up by nolibc. Refactor the logic to avoid defining syscall numbers. Also the new code is easier to understand. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230917-nolibc-syscall-nr-v2-3-03863d509b9a@weissschuh.net --- diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h index 8389820e1928..f05144e46b67 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h @@ -938,11 +938,10 @@ int sys_select(int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set *wfds, fd_set *efds, struct timeva t.tv_nsec = timeout->tv_usec * 1000; } return my_syscall6(__NR_pselect6, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout ? &t : NULL, NULL); -#elif defined(__NR__newselect) || defined(__NR_select) -#ifndef __NR__newselect -#define __NR__newselect __NR_select -#endif +#elif defined(__NR__newselect) return my_syscall5(__NR__newselect, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout); +#elif defined(__NR_select) + return my_syscall5(__NR_select, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout); #else return __nolibc_enosys(__func__, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout); #endif