From: Eyal Birger Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 16:29:20 +0000 (-0800) Subject: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cf6cb56ef24410fb5308f9655087f1eddf4452e6;p=users%2Fdwmw2%2Flinux.git seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHsH6Gs3Eh8DFU0wq58c_LF8A4_+o6z456J7BidmcVY2AqOnHQ@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250121182939.33d05470@gandalf.local.home/T/#me2676c378eff2d6a33f3054fed4a5f3afa64e65b Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250128145806.1849977-1-eyal.birger@gmail.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250202162921.335813-2-eyal.birger@gmail.com [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting, tweaked commit log] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index f59381c4a2ffb..7bbb408431ebc 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -749,6 +749,15 @@ static bool seccomp_is_const_allow(struct sock_fprog_kern *fprog, if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fprog)) return false; + /* Our single exception to filtering. */ +#ifdef __NR_uretprobe +#ifdef SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT + if (sd->arch == SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE) +#endif + if (sd->nr == __NR_uretprobe) + return true; +#endif + for (pc = 0; pc < fprog->len; pc++) { struct sock_filter *insn = &fprog->filter[pc]; u16 code = insn->code; @@ -1023,6 +1032,9 @@ static inline void seccomp_log(unsigned long syscall, long signr, u32 action, */ static const int mode1_syscalls[] = { __NR_seccomp_read, __NR_seccomp_write, __NR_seccomp_exit, __NR_seccomp_sigreturn, +#ifdef __NR_uretprobe + __NR_uretprobe, +#endif -1, /* negative terminated */ };