From: Deepanshu Kartikey Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:33:44 +0000 (+0530) Subject: hugetlbfs: move lock assertions after early returns in huge_pmd_unshare() X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cec944dd329fbefee907da95c298719d900d4787;p=users%2Fhch%2Fmisc.git hugetlbfs: move lock assertions after early returns in huge_pmd_unshare() When hugetlb_vmdelete_list() processes VMAs during truncate operations, it may encounter VMAs where huge_pmd_unshare() is called without the required shareable lock. This triggers an assertion failure in hugetlb_vma_assert_locked(). The previous fix in commit dd83609b8898 ("hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list") skipped entire VMAs without shareable locks to avoid the assertion. However, this prevented pages from being unmapped and freed, causing a regression in fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) operations where pages were not freed immediately, as reported by Mark Brown. Instead of checking locks in the caller or skipping VMAs, move the lock assertions in huge_pmd_unshare() to after the early return checks. The assertions are only needed when actual PMD unsharing work will be performed. If the function returns early because sz != PMD_SIZE or the PMD is not shared, no locks are required and assertions should not fire. This approach reverts the VMA skipping logic from commit dd83609b8898 ("hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list") while moving the assertions to avoid the assertion failure, keeping all the logic within huge_pmd_unshare() itself and allowing page unmapping and freeing to proceed for all VMAs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251014113344.21194-1-kartikey406@gmail.com Fixes: dd83609b8898 ("hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list") Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey Reported-by: Reported-by: Mark Brown Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7 Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand Suggested-by: Oscar Salvador Tested-by: Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c index 9c94ed8c3ab0..f42548ee9083 100644 --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c @@ -478,14 +478,6 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end, if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma)) continue; - /* - * Skip VMAs without shareable locks. Per the design in commit - * 40549ba8f8e0, these will be handled by remove_inode_hugepages() - * called after this function with proper locking. - */ - if (!__vma_shareable_lock(vma)) - goto skip; - v_start = vma_offset_start(vma, start); v_end = vma_offset_end(vma, end); @@ -496,7 +488,6 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end, * vmas. Therefore, lock is not held when calling * unmap_hugepage_range for private vmas. */ -skip: hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma); } } diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 795ee393eac0..0455119716ec 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -7614,13 +7614,12 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, p4d_t *p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr); pud_t *pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr); - i_mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_file->f_mapping); - hugetlb_vma_assert_locked(vma); if (sz != PMD_SIZE) return 0; if (!ptdesc_pmd_is_shared(virt_to_ptdesc(ptep))) return 0; - + i_mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_file->f_mapping); + hugetlb_vma_assert_locked(vma); pud_clear(pud); /* * Once our caller drops the rmap lock, some other process might be