From: Konrad Dybcio Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:14:23 +0000 (+0100) Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Use valid node names for GPI DMAs X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=86348c7587f556d3f0a3f117c3f5b91a69c39df6;p=users%2Fwilly%2Fxarray.git arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Use valid node names for GPI DMAs As pointed out by Intel's robot, the node name doesn't adhere to dt-bindings. Fix errors like this one: qcs9100-ride.dtb: qcom,gpi-dma@800000: $nodename:0: 'qcom,gpi-dma@800000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$' Fixes: 34d17ccb5db8 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add GPI configuration") Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411080206.vFLRjIBZ-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107-topic-sa8775_dma-v1-1-eb633e07b007@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi index cc598e98983f..e2f74c8226d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ #mbox-cells = <2>; }; - gpi_dma2: qcom,gpi-dma@800000 { + gpi_dma2: dma-controller@800000 { compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma"; reg = <0x0 0x00800000 0x0 0x60000>; #dma-cells = <3>; @@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ }; - gpi_dma0: qcom,gpi-dma@900000 { + gpi_dma0: dma-controller@900000 { compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma"; reg = <0x0 0x00900000 0x0 0x60000>; #dma-cells = <3>; @@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ }; }; - gpi_dma1: qcom,gpi-dma@a00000 { + gpi_dma1: dma-controller@a00000 { compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma"; reg = <0x0 0x00a00000 0x0 0x60000>; #dma-cells = <3>; @@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ }; }; - gpi_dma3: qcom,gpi-dma@b00000 { + gpi_dma3: dma-controller@b00000 { compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma"; reg = <0x0 0x00b00000 0x0 0x58000>; #dma-cells = <3>;