From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 21:00:58 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting
X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=76a2b9a8ab441e4505cebe658feb0c27ba209d44;p=users%2Fjedix%2Flinux-maple.git

nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting

In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment
confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe.

Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
index 1ba666bcb900b..81fbad5e939df 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
-	 * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints
-	 * will handle.
+	 * Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing.
+	 * This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum.
+	 * Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum.
 	 */
 	ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX);
 	if (ret) {