From: Kemeng Shi Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:24:35 +0000 (+0800) Subject: jbd2: use bh_in instead of jh2bh(jh_in) to simplify code X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4eb9bd13eba3c168e91460972a76ddd53ac3b2b0;p=linux.git jbd2: use bh_in instead of jh2bh(jh_in) to simplify code We save jh2bh(jh_in) to bh_in, so use bh_in directly instead of jh2bh(jh_in) to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240514112438.1269037-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o --- diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c index d69f8e0a12e0..1ea96ab9374a 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c @@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction, new_folio = virt_to_folio(jh_in->b_frozen_data); new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, jh_in->b_frozen_data); } else { - new_folio = jh2bh(jh_in)->b_folio; - new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, jh2bh(jh_in)->b_data); + new_folio = bh_in->b_folio; + new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, bh_in->b_data); } mapped_data = kmap_local_folio(new_folio, new_offset);