From: Mark Fasheh Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:42:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: btrfs: fix clone / extent-same deadlocks X-Git-Tag: v4.1.12-110.0.20170822_0730~22 X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=35b045e99e723012075206c1be36c7e50dfb9f42;p=users%2Fjedix%2Flinux-maple.git btrfs: fix clone / extent-same deadlocks Clone and extent same lock their source and target inodes in opposite order. In addition to this, the range locking in clone doesn't take ordering into account. Fix this by having clone use the same locking helpers as btrfs-extent-same. In addition, I do a small cleanup of the locking helpers, removing a case (both inodes being the same) which was poorly accounted for and never actually used by the callers. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Chris Mason (Cherry picked from commit 293a8489f300536dc6d996c35a6ebb89aa03bab2) Orabug: 26251039 Signed-off-by: Shan Hai Acked-by: Shannon Nelson Acked-by: John Haxby --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 750b3d7b7d670..2ca659191ae9e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -2891,8 +2891,7 @@ static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2) swap(inode1, inode2); mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT); - if (inode1 != inode2) - mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD); + mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD); } static void btrfs_double_extent_unlock(struct inode *inode1, u64 loff1, @@ -2910,8 +2909,7 @@ static void btrfs_double_extent_lock(struct inode *inode1, u64 loff1, swap(loff1, loff2); } lock_extent_range(inode1, loff1, len); - if (inode1 != inode2) - lock_extent_range(inode2, loff2, len); + lock_extent_range(inode2, loff2, len); } struct cmp_pages { @@ -3945,13 +3943,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, goto out_fput; if (!same_inode) { - if (inode < src) { - mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT); - mutex_lock_nested(&src->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD); - } else { - mutex_lock_nested(&src->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT); - mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD); - } + btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, inode); } else { mutex_lock(&src->i_mutex); } @@ -4001,8 +3993,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, lock_extent_range(src, lock_start, lock_len); } else { - lock_extent_range(src, off, len); - lock_extent_range(inode, destoff, len); + btrfs_double_extent_lock(src, off, inode, destoff, len); } ret = btrfs_clone(src, inode, off, olen, len, destoff, 0); @@ -4013,9 +4004,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(src)->io_tree, lock_start, lock_end); } else { - unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(src)->io_tree, off, off + len - 1); - unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, destoff, - destoff + len - 1); + btrfs_double_extent_unlock(src, off, inode, destoff, len); } /* * Truncate page cache pages so that future reads will see the cloned @@ -4024,17 +4013,10 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, truncate_inode_pages_range(&inode->i_data, destoff, PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(destoff + len) - 1); out_unlock: - if (!same_inode) { - if (inode < src) { - mutex_unlock(&src->i_mutex); - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); - } else { - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); - mutex_unlock(&src->i_mutex); - } - } else { + if (!same_inode) + btrfs_double_inode_unlock(src, inode); + else mutex_unlock(&src->i_mutex); - } out_fput: fdput(src_file); out_drop_write: