From: Anubhav Shelat Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:29:22 +0000 (-0400) Subject: perf header: remove unecessary core id test X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=13b38e6b8059de096ebddb5d770c2419943949b7;p=users%2Fjedix%2Flinux-maple.git perf header: remove unecessary core id test It is possible for systems to have a greater socket id number than the number of cpus present on a machine, so this test is obselete and should be removed. Signed-off-by: Anubhav Shelat Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250618142921.4053400-2-ashelat@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c index e3cdc3b7b4ab..d7f6ff6974aa 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c @@ -2559,7 +2559,6 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) int cpu_nr = ff->ph->env.nr_cpus_avail; u64 size = 0; struct perf_header *ph = ff->ph; - bool do_core_id_test = true; ph->env.cpu = calloc(cpu_nr, sizeof(*ph->env.cpu)); if (!ph->env.cpu) @@ -2614,15 +2613,6 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) return 0; } - /* On s390 the socket_id number is not related to the numbers of cpus. - * The socket_id number might be higher than the numbers of cpus. - * This depends on the configuration. - * AArch64 is the same. - */ - if (ph->env.arch && (!strncmp(ph->env.arch, "s390", 4) - || !strncmp(ph->env.arch, "aarch64", 7))) - do_core_id_test = false; - for (i = 0; i < (u32)cpu_nr; i++) { if (do_read_u32(ff, &nr)) goto free_cpu; @@ -2633,12 +2623,6 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) if (do_read_u32(ff, &nr)) goto free_cpu; - if (do_core_id_test && nr != (u32)-1 && nr > (u32)cpu_nr) { - pr_debug("socket_id number is too big." - "You may need to upgrade the perf tool.\n"); - goto free_cpu; - } - ph->env.cpu[i].socket_id = nr; size += sizeof(u32); }