From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:43:28 +0000 (+1000)
Subject: memfd_secret: use unsigned int rather than long as syscall flags type
X-Git-Url: https://www.infradead.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=03fdb72466854691107b2060260ee2db8dce6675;p=users%2Fjedix%2Flinux-maple.git

memfd_secret: use unsigned int rather than long as syscall flags type

Yuri Norov says:

  If parameter size is the same for native and compat ABIs, we may
  wire a syscall made by compat client to native handler. This is
  true for unsigned int, but not true for unsigned long or pointer.

  That's why I suggest using unsigned int and so avoid creating compat
  entry point.

Use unsigned int as the type of the flags parameter in memfd_secret()
system call.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331142345.27532-1-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
index c878c2b841fc3..2462f52e9c966 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static unsigned long page_size;
 static unsigned long mlock_limit_cur;
 static unsigned long mlock_limit_max;
 
-static int memfd_secret(unsigned long flags)
+static int memfd_secret(unsigned int flags)
 {
 	return syscall(__NR_memfd_secret, flags);
 }