selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo

Fix trivial typo in comment from 'oveflow' to 'overflow'.

Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211122070528.837806-1-dfustini@baylibre.com

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
index d6272013a5a372013930b30c7b815fa93fe5b8b2..af47aeb211e7d676e4a39a4db4cbbf5e61df930a 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
        /* overflow bpf_sock_ops struct with final element nonzero/zero.
         * Regardless of the value of the final field, we don't have all the
         * data we need to display it, so we should trigger an overflow.
-        * In other words oveflow checking should trump "is field zero?"
+        * In other words overflow checking should trump "is field zero?"
         * checks because if we've overflowed, it shouldn't matter what the
         * field is - we can't trust its value so shouldn't display it.
         */