When looking for viable candidates to shrink, we only want objects that
are not pinned. However to do so we performed a double iteration over
the vma in the objects, first looking for the pin-count, then looking
for allocations. We can do both at once and be slightly more explicit in
our validity test.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
        struct i915_vma *vma;
        int count = 0;
 
-       list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
+       list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
                if (drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
                        count++;
+               if (vma->pin_count)
+                       count++;
+       }
 
        return count;
 }
                        count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
        list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list, global_list) {
-               if (!i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(obj) &&
-                   obj->pages_pin_count == num_vma_bound(obj))
+               if (obj->pages_pin_count == num_vma_bound(obj))
                        count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
        }