need_preemptive_reclaim() does some calculations, which aren't heavy,
but if we're already running preemptive reclaim there's no reason to do
them at all, so re-order the checks so that we don't do the calculation
if we're already doing reclaim.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
                 * the async reclaim as we will panic.
                 */
                if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags) &&
-                   need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info) &&
-                   !work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work)) {
+                   !work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work) &&
+                   need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info)) {
                        trace_btrfs_trigger_flush(fs_info, space_info->flags,
                                                  orig_bytes, flush, "preempt");
                        queue_work(system_unbound_wq,