Test-case:
	void *tfunc(void *arg)
	{
		execvp("true", NULL);
		return NULL;
	}
	int main(void)
	{
		int pid;
		if (fork()) {
			pthread_t t;
			kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);
			pthread_create(&t, NULL, tfunc, NULL);
			for (;;)
				pause();
		}
		pid = getppid();
		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0,0) == 0);
		while (wait(NULL) > 0)
			ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0,0);
		return 0;
	}
It is racy, exit_notify() does __wake_up_parent() too. But in the
likely case it triggers the problem: de_thread() does release_task()
and the old leader goes away without the notification, the tracer
sleeps in do_wait() without children/tracees.
Change de_thread() to do __wake_up_parent(traced_leader->parent).
Since it is already EXIT_DEAD we can do this without ptrace_unlink(),
EXIT_DEAD threads do not exist from do_wait's pov.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
 
                BUG_ON(leader->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE);
                leader->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
+
+               /*
+                * We are going to release_task()->ptrace_unlink() silently,
+                * the tracer can sleep in do_wait(). EXIT_DEAD guarantees
+                * the tracer wont't block again waiting for this thread.
+                */
+               if (unlikely(leader->ptrace))
+                       __wake_up_parent(leader, leader->parent);
                write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
                release_task(leader);