When starting/proceeding MCC, it will abort an ongoing hw scan process.
In the proceeding cases, it unexpectedly tries to abort a non-exist hw
scan process. Then, a trace shown at the bottom will happen. This problem
is caused by a previous commit which changed some call sequence inside
rtw89_hw_scan_complete() to fix some coex problems. These changes lead
to our scanning flag was not cleared when proceeding MCC. To keep the
fixes on coex, and resolve the problem here, re-consider the related
call sequence.
The known sequence requirements are listed below.
* the old sequence:
	A. notify coex
	B. clear scanning flag
	C. proceed chanctx
		C-1. set channel
		C-2. proceed MCC
(the problem: A needs to be after C-1)
* the current sequence:
	C. proceed chanctx
		C-1. set channel
		C-2. proceed MCC
	A. notify coex
	B. clear scanning flag
(the problem: C-2 needs to be after B)
So, now let hw scan caller pass a callback to proceed chanctx if needed.
Then, the new sequence will be like the below.
	C-1. set channel
	A. notify coex
	B. clear scanning flag
	C-2. proceed MCC
The following is the kernel log for the problem in current sequence.
rtw89_8852be 0000:04:00.0: rtw89_hw_scan_offload failed ret -110
------------[ cut here ]------------
[...]
CPU: 2 PID: 3991 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Tainted: G           OE      6.6.17 #3
Hardware name: LENOVO 
2356AD1/
2356AD1, BIOS G7ETB3WW (2.73 ) 11/28/2018
Workqueue: events_unbound wiphy_work_cancel [cfg80211]
RIP: 0010:ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
Code: 9c 24 d0 11 00 00 49 39 dd 0f 85 46 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 09 2d
RSP: 0018:
ffffb27783643d48 EFLAGS: 
00010246
RAX: 
0000000000000000 RBX: 
0000000000000000 RCX: 
0000000000000000
RDX: 
ffff8a2280964bc0 RSI: 
0000000000000000 RDI: 
ffff8a23df580900
RBP: 
ffffb27783643d88 R08: 
0000000000000001 R09: 
0000000000000400
R10: 
0000000000000000 R11: 
0000000000008268 R12: 
ffff8a23df580900
R13: 
ffff8a23df581b00 R14: 
0000000000000000 R15: 
0000000000000000
FS:  
0000000000000000(0000) GS:
ffff8a258e680000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 
0000000080050033
CR2: 
00007f26a0654000 CR3: 
000000002ea2e002 CR4: 
00000000001706e0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? show_regs+0x68/0x70
 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
 ? __warn+0x8f/0x150
 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
 ? report_bug+0x1f5/0x200
 ? handle_bug+0x46/0x80
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
 ieee80211_scan_work+0x14a/0x650 [mac80211]
 ? __queue_work+0x10f/0x410
 wiphy_work_cancel+0x2fb/0x310 [cfg80211]
 process_scheduled_works+0x9d/0x390
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 worker_thread+0x15b/0x2d0
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0x108/0x140
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>
---[ end trace 
0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: f16c40acd319 ("wifi: rtw89: Fix TX fail with A2DP after scanning")
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241231004811.8646-2-pkshih@realtek.com
        hal->entity_pause = true;
 }
 
-void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
+static void rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+                                    const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *parm)
+{
+       int ret;
+
+       if (!parm || !parm->cb)
+               return;
+
+       ret = parm->cb(rtwdev, parm->data);
+       if (ret)
+               rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "%s (%s): cb failed: %d\n", __func__,
+                          parm->caller ?: "unknown", ret);
+}
+
+/* pass @cb_parm if there is a @cb_parm->cb which needs to invoke right after
+ * call rtw89_set_channel() and right before proceed entity according to mode.
+ */
+void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+                          const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *cb_parm)
 {
        struct rtw89_hal *hal = &rtwdev->hal;
        enum rtw89_entity_mode mode;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
-       if (!hal->entity_pause)
+       if (unlikely(!hal->entity_pause)) {
+               rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(rtwdev, cb_parm);
                return;
+       }
 
        rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_CHAN, "chanctx proceed\n");
 
        hal->entity_pause = false;
        rtw89_set_channel(rtwdev);
 
+       rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(rtwdev, cb_parm);
+
        mode = rtw89_get_entity_mode(rtwdev);
        switch (mode) {
        case RTW89_ENTITY_MODE_MCC:
 
        RTW89_CHANCTX_PAUSE_REASON_ROC,
 };
 
+struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm {
+       int (*cb)(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, void *data);
+       void *data;
+       const char *caller;
+};
+
 struct rtw89_entity_weight {
        unsigned int active_chanctxs;
        unsigned int active_roles;
 void rtw89_chanctx_track(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
 void rtw89_chanctx_pause(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
                         enum rtw89_chanctx_pause_reasons rsn);
-void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
+void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+                          const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *cb_parm);
 
 const struct rtw89_chan *__rtw89_mgnt_chan_get(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
                                               const char *caller_message,
 
 
        roc->state = RTW89_ROC_IDLE;
        rtw89_config_roc_chandef(rtwdev, rtwvif_link->chanctx_idx, NULL);
-       rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev);
+       rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev, NULL);
        ret = rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, true, false);
        if (ret)
                rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_TXRX,
 
        rtw89_chanctx_pause(rtwdev, RTW89_CHANCTX_PAUSE_REASON_HW_SCAN);
 }
 
-void rtw89_hw_scan_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
-                           struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link,
-                           bool aborted)
+struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data {
+       struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
+       bool aborted;
+};
+
+static int rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, void *data)
 {
        const struct rtw89_mac_gen_def *mac = rtwdev->chip->mac_def;
        struct rtw89_hw_scan_info *scan_info = &rtwdev->scan_info;
+       struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data *cb_data = data;
+       struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link = cb_data->rtwvif_link;
        struct cfg80211_scan_info info = {
-               .aborted = aborted,
+               .aborted = cb_data->aborted,
        };
        struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif;
        u32 reg;
 
        if (!rtwvif_link)
-               return;
-
-       rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev);
+               return -EINVAL;
 
        rtwvif = rtwvif_link->rtwvif;
 
        scan_info->last_chan_idx = 0;
        scan_info->scanning_vif = NULL;
        scan_info->abort = false;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+void rtw89_hw_scan_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+                           struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link,
+                           bool aborted)
+{
+       struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data cb_data = {
+               .rtwvif_link = rtwvif_link,
+               .aborted = aborted,
+       };
+       const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm cb_parm = {
+               .cb = rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb,
+               .data = &cb_data,
+               .caller = __func__,
+       };
+
+       /* The things here needs to be done after setting channel (for coex)
+        * and before proceeding entity mode (for MCC). So, pass a callback
+        * of them for the right sequence rather than doing them directly.
+        */
+       rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev, &cb_parm);
 }
 
 void rtw89_hw_scan_abort(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,