The nr_dirty_[background_]threshold fields are misplaced before the
numa_* fields, and users will read strange values.
This is the right order.  Before patch, nr_dirty_background_threshold
will read as 0 (the value from numa_miss).
	numa_hit 128501
	numa_miss 0
	numa_foreign 0
	numa_interleave 7388
	numa_local 128501
	numa_other 0
	nr_dirty_threshold 144291
	nr_dirty_background_threshold 72145
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
        "nr_shmem",
        "nr_dirtied",
        "nr_written",
-       "nr_dirty_threshold",
-       "nr_dirty_background_threshold",
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
        "numa_hit",
        "numa_local",
        "numa_other",
 #endif
+       "nr_dirty_threshold",
+       "nr_dirty_background_threshold",
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
        "pgpgin",