Fix a couple of inefficiencies and redundancies related to
have_tracepoints() and its use when checking whether to write
TRACE_INFO.
First, there's no need to use get_tracepoints_path() in
have_tracepoints() - we really just want the part that checks whether
any attributes correspondo to tracepoints.
Second, we really don't care about raw_samples per se - tracepoints
are always raw_samples.  In any case, the have_tracepoints() check
should be sufficient to decide whether or not to write TRACE_INFO.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <
1273030770.6383.6.camel@tropicana>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
                        return err;
        }
 
-       if (raw_samples && have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters)) {
+       if (have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters))
                perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
-       } else {
-               for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++) {
-                       if (attrs[i].sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW &&
-                               attrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
-                               perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
-                               break;
-                       }
-               }
-       }
 
        atexit(atexit_header);
 
 
 
 bool have_tracepoints(struct perf_event_attr *pattrs, int nb_events)
 {
-       return get_tracepoints_path(pattrs, nb_events) ? true : false;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < nb_events; i++)
+               if (pattrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
+                       return true;
+
+       return false;
 }
 
 int read_tracing_data(int fd, struct perf_event_attr *pattrs, int nb_events)