Here is the UBSAN dump:
[    3.866656] index 2 is out of range for type 'amdgpu_uvd_inst [2]'
[    3.866693] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
[    3.866702] Call Trace:
[    3.866710]  dump_stack+0x85/0xc5
[    3.866719]  ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
[    3.866727]  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x89/0x90
[    3.866737]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x58/0x60
[    3.866746]  ? __kmalloc+0x26c/0x2d0
[    3.866846]  amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring+0x259/0x280 [amdgpu]
[    3.866896]  amdgpu_ring_init+0x12c/0x710 [amdgpu]
[    3.866906]  ? sprintf+0x42/0x50
[    3.866956]  amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring+0x1bc/0x3a0 [amdgpu]
[    3.867009]  gfx_v8_0_sw_init+0x1ad3/0x2360 [amdgpu]
[    3.867062]  ? smu7_init+0xec/0x160 [amdgpu]
[    3.867109]  amdgpu_device_init+0x112c/0x1dc0 [amdgpu]
'ring->me' might be set as 2 with 'amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring', that would
cause out of range for 'amdgpu_uvd_inst[2]'.
v2: simplified with ring type
Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
        uint64_t index;
 
-       if (ring != &adev->uvd.inst[ring->me].ring) {
+       if (ring->funcs->type != AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_UVD) {
                ring->fence_drv.cpu_addr = &adev->wb.wb[ring->fence_offs];
                ring->fence_drv.gpu_addr = adev->wb.gpu_addr + (ring->fence_offs * 4);
        } else {