In the case where an inode has a very stale transaction id (tid) in
i_datasync_tid or i_sync_tid, it's possible that after a very large
(2**31) number of transactions, that the tid number space might wrap,
causing tid_geq()'s calculations to fail.
Commit 
deeeaf13 "jbd2: fix fsync() tid wraparound bug", later modified
by commit 
e7b04ac0 "jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily",
attempted to fix this problem, but it only avoided kjournald spinning
forever by fixing the logic in jbd2_log_start_commit().
Unfortunately, in the codepaths in fs/ext4/fsync.c and fs/ext4/inode.c
that might call jbd2_log_start_commit() with a stale tid, those
functions will subsequently call jbd2_log_wait_commit() with the same
stale tid, and then wait for a very long time.  To fix this, we
replace the calls to jbd2_log_start_commit() and
jbd2_log_wait_commit() with a call to a new function,
jbd2_complete_transaction(), which will correctly handle stale tid's.
As a bonus, jbd2_complete_transaction() will avoid locking
j_state_lock for writing unless a commit needs to be started.  This
should have a small (but probably not measurable) improvement for
ext4's scalability.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Reported-by: George Barnett <gbarnett@atlassian.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
 
        if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER &&
            !jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier(journal, commit_tid))
                needs_barrier = true;
-       jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, commit_tid);
-       ret = jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, commit_tid);
+       ret = jbd2_complete_transaction(journal, commit_tid);
        if (needs_barrier) {
                err = blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
                if (!ret)
 
                        journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal;
                        tid_t commit_tid = EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid;
 
-                       jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, commit_tid);
-                       jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, commit_tid);
+                       jbd2_complete_transaction(journal, commit_tid);
                        filemap_write_and_wait(&inode->i_data);
                }
                truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
 
        return err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * When this function returns the transaction corresponding to tid
+ * will be completed.  If the transaction has currently running, start
+ * committing that transaction before waiting for it to complete.  If
+ * the transaction id is stale, it is by definition already completed,
+ * so just return SUCCESS.
+ */
+int jbd2_complete_transaction(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid)
+{
+       int     need_to_wait = 1;
+
+       read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+       if (journal->j_running_transaction &&
+           journal->j_running_transaction->t_tid == tid) {
+               if (journal->j_commit_request != tid) {
+                       /* transaction not yet started, so request it */
+                       read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+                       jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, tid);
+                       goto wait_commit;
+               }
+       } else if (!(journal->j_committing_transaction &&
+                    journal->j_committing_transaction->t_tid == tid))
+               need_to_wait = 0;
+       read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+       if (!need_to_wait)
+               return 0;
+wait_commit:
+       return jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, tid);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_complete_transaction);
+
 /*
  * Log buffer allocation routines:
  */
 
 int jbd2_journal_start_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t *tid);
 int jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested(journal_t *journal);
 int jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid);
+int jbd2_complete_transaction(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid);
 int jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(journal_t *journal);
 int jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid);