Previously, there was a erroneous scenario like below.
thread 1:                       thread 2:
 f2fs_unlink
  - acquire_orphan_inode
    : sbi->n_orphans++           write_checkpoint
                                 - block_operations
                                  : f2fs_lock_all
                                 - do_checkpoint
                                  : write orphan blocks with sbi->n_orphans
                                 - unblock_operations
  - f2fs_lock_op
  - release_orphan_inode
  - f2fs_unlock_op
During the checkpoint by thread 2, f2fs stores a wrong orphan block according
to the wrong sbi->n_orphans.
To avoid this, simply we should make cover acquire_orphan_inode too with
f2fs_lock_op.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
        if (!de)
                goto fail;
 
+       f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
        err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
        if (err) {
+               f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
                kunmap(page);
                f2fs_put_page(page, 0);
                goto fail;
        }
-
-       f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
        f2fs_delete_entry(de, page, inode);
        f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);