remoteproc: Traverse rproc_list under RCU read lock

In order to be able to traverse the mostly read-only rproc_list without
locking during panic migrate traversal to be done under rcu_read_lock().

Mutual exclusion for modifications of the list continues to be handled
by the rproc_list_mutex and a synchronization point is added before
releasing objects that are popped from the list.

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200324052904.738594-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index a9ac1d01e09b6a2999e7c478ba1d2f8fa184dd25..7ee976ee20444cb01456a75d2b20254568d36169 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/devcoredump.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
 #include <linux/iommu.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
@@ -1868,8 +1869,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
        if (!np)
                return NULL;
 
-       mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
-       list_for_each_entry(r, &rproc_list, node) {
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(r, &rproc_list, node) {
                if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent->of_node == np) {
                        /* prevent underlying implementation from being removed */
                        if (!try_module_get(r->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
@@ -1882,7 +1883,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
                        break;
                }
        }
-       mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
 
        of_node_put(np);
 
@@ -1939,7 +1940,7 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 
        /* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */
        mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
-       list_add(&rproc->node, &rproc_list);
+       list_add_rcu(&rproc->node, &rproc_list);
        mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
 
        return 0;
@@ -2156,9 +2157,12 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 
        /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
        mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
-       list_del(&rproc->node);
+       list_del_rcu(&rproc->node);
        mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
 
+       /* Ensure that no readers of rproc_list are still active */
+       synchronize_rcu();
+
        device_del(&rproc->dev);
 
        return 0;