We have relied upon the sole caller (wait_ioctl) validating the timeout
argument. However, when waiting for multiple requests I forgot to ensure
that the timeout was still positive on the later requests. This is more
simply done inside __i915_wait_request.
Fixes regression introduced in
commit 
b47161858ba13c9c7e03333132230d66e008dd55
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Apr 27 13:41:17 2015 +0100
    drm/i915: Implement inter-engine read-read optimisations
The impact of the regression is 1 jiffie for each extra active ring for
a wait_ioctl with a timeout -- I don't think anyone has noticed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1448544702-5594-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
 
        if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true))
                return 0;
 
-       timeout_expire = timeout ?
-               jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0;
+       timeout_expire = 0;
+       if (timeout) {
+               if (WARN_ON(*timeout < 0))
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
+               if (*timeout == 0)
+                       return -ETIME;
+
+               timeout_expire = jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(*timeout);
+       }
 
        if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6)
                gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv, rps, req->emitted_jiffies);