This commit fixes a potential race condition in the userqueue fence
signaling mechanism by replacing dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() with
dma_fence_is_signaled().
The issue occurred because:
1. dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() should only be used when holding
the fence's individual lock, not just the fence list lock
2. Using the locked variant without the proper fence lock could lead
to double-signaling scenarios:
- Hardware completion signals the fence
- Software path also tries to signal the same fence
By using dma_fence_is_signaled() instead, we properly handle the
locking hierarchy and avoid the race condition while still maintaining
the necessary synchronization through the fence_list_lock.
v2: drop the comment (Christian)
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
/* Check if hardware has already processed the job */
spin_lock_irqsave(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock, flags);
- if (!dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(fence))
+ if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
list_add_tail(&userq_fence->link, &fence_drv->fences);
else
dma_fence_put(fence);