When no active_reqs, devfreq_monitor (thread A) will suspend clock scaling.
But it may have racing with clk_scaling.suspend_work (thread B) and
actually not suspend clock scaling (requeue after suspend). Next time
after polling_ms, devfreq_monitor read clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0 then
scale up clock abnormal.
Below is racing step:
devfreq->work (Thread A)
devfreq_monitor
update_devfreq
.....
ufshcd_devfreq_target
queue_work(hba->clk_scaling.workq,
1 &hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work)
.....
5 queue_delayed_work(devfreq_wq, &devfreq->work,
msecs_to_jiffies(devfreq->profile->polling_ms));
2 hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work (Thread B)
ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work
__ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling
devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq);
3 cancel_delayed_work_sync(&devfreq->work);
4 hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0;
.....
Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831130826.5592-4-peter.wang@mediatek.com
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
return 0;
}
+ /* Skip scaling clock when clock scaling is suspended */
+ if (hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
+ dev_warn(hba->dev, "clock scaling is suspended, skip");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (!hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs)
sched_clk_scaling_suspend_work = true;