bpf_prog_aux->func field might be NULL if program does not have
subprograms except for main sub-program. The fixed commit does
bpf_prog_aux->func access unconditionally, which might lead to null
pointer dereference.
The bug could be triggered by replacing the following BPF program:
SEC("tc")
int main_changes(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
return 0;
}
With the following BPF program:
SEC("freplace")
long changes_pkt_data(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
}
bpf_prog_aux instance itself represents the main sub-program,
use this property to fix the bug.
Fixes: 81f6d0530ba0 ("bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202412111822.qGw6tOyB-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212070711.427443-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
}
if (tgt_prog) {
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = tgt_prog->aux;
+ bool tgt_changes_pkt_data;
if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux) &&
!bpf_prog_dev_bound_match(prog, tgt_prog)) {
"Extension programs should be JITed\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (prog->aux->changes_pkt_data &&
- !aux->func[subprog]->aux->changes_pkt_data) {
+ tgt_changes_pkt_data = aux->func
+ ? aux->func[subprog]->aux->changes_pkt_data
+ : aux->changes_pkt_data;
+ if (prog->aux->changes_pkt_data && !tgt_changes_pkt_data) {
bpf_log(log,
"Extension program changes packet data, while original does not\n");
return -EINVAL;