Actually ENETC VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC because only
ENETC PF can access PMa_SINGLE_STEP registers. And there will be a crash
if VFs are used to test one-step timestamp, the crash log as follows.
[ 129.110909] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
00000000000080c0
[ 129.287769] Call trace:
[ 129.290219] enetc_port_mac_wr+0x30/0xec (P)
[ 129.294504] enetc_start_xmit+0xda4/0xe74
[ 129.298525] enetc_xmit+0x70/0xec
[ 129.301848] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x98/0x118
Fixes: 41514737ecaa ("enetc: add get_ts_info interface for ethtool")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250224111251.1061098-5-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP;
break;
case HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC:
+ if (!enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
new_offloads &= ~ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP_MASK;
new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP;
break;
static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev,
struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info)
{
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
int *phc_idx;
phc_idx = symbol_get(enetc_phc_index);
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE;
info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
- (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) |
- (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
+ (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON);
+
+ if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si))
+ info->tx_types |= (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
(1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);