mfd: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to t7166xb drivers

No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size.

Modify clients to use mfd_get_cell helper function instead of
accessing platform_data directly.

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c b/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
index 9caeb4ac6ea6c2b1fa72eb63a8c678fefef28b14..b9c1e4c630a837d105905397f396465161596dbf 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
@@ -384,15 +384,6 @@ static int t7l66xb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
        t7l66xb_attach_irq(dev);
 
        t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].driver_data = pdata->nand_data;
-       t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].platform_data =
-               &t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND];
-       t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].data_size =
-               sizeof(t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND]);
-
-       t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC].platform_data =
-               &t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC];
-       t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC].data_size =
-               sizeof(t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC]);
 
        ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, dev->id,
                              t7l66xb_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(t7l66xb_cells),

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
index 3041d1f7ae3fc4ed3f6e00a3a4f0d444cdb69ce0..5bf63e31e5d0104bb3e255d193fd357e04fdcae8 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int tmio_nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned char *buf,
 
 static int tmio_hw_init(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
 {
-       struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+       struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
        int ret;
 
        if (cell->enable) {
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int tmio_hw_init(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
 
 static void tmio_hw_stop(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
 {
-       struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+       struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
 
        tmio_iowrite8(FCR_MODE_POWER_OFF, tmio->fcr + FCR_MODE);
        if (cell->disable)
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void tmio_hw_stop(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
 
 static int tmio_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
-       struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+       struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
        struct tmio_nand_data *data = cell->driver_data;
        struct resource *fcr = platform_get_resource(dev,
                        IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static int tmio_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 static int tmio_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
 {
-       struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+       struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
 
        if (cell->suspend)
                cell->suspend(dev);
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int tmio_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
 
 static int tmio_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
-       struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+       struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
 
        /* FIXME - is this required or merely another attack of the broken
         * SHARP platform? Looks suspicious.