Variables managed with __free() should typically be initialized where
they are declared so that the __free() callback is paired with its
counterpart resource allocator. Fix the second instance of using
__free() in gpio-sim to follow this pattern.
Fixes: 3faf89f27aab ("gpio: sim: simplify code with cleanup helpers")
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
 static struct config_group *
 gpio_sim_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *group, const char *name)
 {
-       struct gpio_sim_device *dev __free(kfree) = NULL;
        int id;
 
-       dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+       struct gpio_sim_device *dev __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev),
+                                                           GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!dev)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);