c6x: fix misleading comment

A comment in entry.S incorrectly stated that interrupt vectors
called __do_IRQ() and that int6 vector was used for syscalls.
Both statements are incorrect for the current kernel, so this
patch cleans up the wording to reflect current reality.

Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S b/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S
index 0c164c2c22bec4e237738ffac0d6c205d38a6556..0ed6157dd256a81aeefc9e8de971f834f313a11d 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S
@@ -429,8 +429,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_execve)
 ENDPROC(ret_from_kernel_execve)
 
        ;;
-       ;; These are the interrupt handlers, responsible for calling __do_IRQ()
-       ;; int6 is used for syscalls (see _system_call entry)
+       ;; These are the interrupt handlers, responsible for calling c6x_do_IRQ()
        ;;
        .macro SAVE_ALL_INT
        SAVE_ALL IRP,ITSR