When irqs are soft-disabled, MSR[EE] is volatile and can change from
1 to 0 asynchronously (if a PACA_IRQ_MUST_HARD_MASK interrupt hits).
So it can not be used to check hard IRQ enabled status, except to
confirm it is disabled.
ppc64_runlatch_on/off functions use MSR this way to decide whether to
re-enable MSR[EE] after disabling it, which leads to MSR[EE] being
enabled when it shouldn't be (when a PACA_IRQ_MUST_HARD_MASK had
disabled it between reading the MSR and clearing EE).
This has been tolerated in the kernel previously, and it doesn't seem
to cause a problem, but it is unexpected and may trip warnings or cause
other problems as we tighten up this state management. Fix this by only
re-enabling if PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS is clear.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220926054305.2671436-5-npiggin@gmail.com
do { \
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_CTRL) && \
test_thread_local_flags(_TLF_RUNLATCH)) { \
- unsigned long msr = mfmsr(); \
__hard_irq_disable(); \
__ppc64_runlatch_off(); \
- if (msr & MSR_EE) \
+ if (!(local_paca->irq_happened & PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS)) \
__hard_irq_enable(); \
} \
} while (0)
do { \
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_CTRL) && \
!test_thread_local_flags(_TLF_RUNLATCH)) { \
- unsigned long msr = mfmsr(); \
__hard_irq_disable(); \
__ppc64_runlatch_on(); \
- if (msr & MSR_EE) \
+ if (!(local_paca->irq_happened & PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS)) \
__hard_irq_enable(); \
} \
} while (0)