According to the RISC-V calling convention register usage here [0], a0
is used as return value register, so rename it to make it consistent
with the spec.
[0] section 18.2, table 18.2
https://riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/riscv-calling.pdf
Fixes: 589fed479ba1 ("riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.h")
Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Amjad OULED-AMEUR <ouledameur.amjad@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220706140204.47926-1-dlan@gentoo.org
#define __PT_PARM5_REG a4
#define __PT_RET_REG ra
#define __PT_FP_REG s0
-#define __PT_RC_REG a5
+#define __PT_RC_REG a0
#define __PT_SP_REG sp
#define __PT_IP_REG pc
/* riscv does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER. */