arm64: fix types in copy_highpage()

In copy_highpage() the `kto` and `kfrom` local variables are pointers to
struct page, but these are used to hold arbitrary pointers to kernel memory
. Each call to page_address() returns a void pointer to memory associated
with the relevant page, and copy_page() expects void pointers to this
memory.

This inconsistency was introduced in commit 2563776b41c3 ("arm64: mte:
Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations") and while this
doesn't appear to be harmful in practice it is clearly wrong.

Correct this by making `kto` and `kfrom` void pointers.

Fixes: 2563776b41c3 ("arm64: mte: Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations")
Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420030418.3189040-3-tongtiangen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c
index b5447e53cd73ee48ae65ecb90be18b3529bc4d34..0dea80bf6de469e6ab3d5b584d451cf100e77e94 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
 
 void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from)
 {
-       struct page *kto = page_address(to);
-       struct page *kfrom = page_address(from);
+       void *kto = page_address(to);
+       void *kfrom = page_address(from);
 
        copy_page(kto, kfrom);