At the beginning in 2009 one patch [1] introduced collecting drop
counter in nf_conntrack_in() by returning -NF_DROP. Later, another
patch [2] changed the return value of tcp_packet() which now is
renamed to nf_conntrack_tcp_packet() from -NF_DROP to NF_DROP. As
we can see, that -NF_DROP should be corrected.
Similarly, there are other two points where the -NF_DROP is used.
Well, as NF_DROP is equal to 0, inverting NF_DROP makes no sense
as patch [2] said many years ago.
[1]
commit
7d1e04598e5e ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: account packets drop by tcp_packet()")
[2]
commit
ec8d540969da ("netfilter: conntrack: fix dropping packet after l4proto->packet()")
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
return -ENOMEM;
/* Entry 1 is the FORWARD hook */
((struct ipt_standard *)repl->entries)[1].target.verdict =
- forward ? -NF_ACCEPT - 1 : -NF_DROP - 1;
+ forward ? -NF_ACCEPT - 1 : NF_DROP - 1;
err = ipt_register_table(net, &packet_filter, repl, filter_ops);
kfree(repl);
return -ENOMEM;
/* Entry 1 is the FORWARD hook */
((struct ip6t_standard *)repl->entries)[1].target.verdict =
- forward ? -NF_ACCEPT - 1 : -NF_DROP - 1;
+ forward ? -NF_ACCEPT - 1 : NF_DROP - 1;
err = ip6t_register_table(net, &packet_filter, repl, filter_ops);
kfree(repl);
goto repeat;
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, invalid);
- if (ret == -NF_DROP)
+ if (ret == NF_DROP)
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, drop);
ret = -ret;