No local_bh_disable is needed there once we run everything in process
context. The same goes for the replacement of bh_lock_sock() by
lock_sock().
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
 
        BT_DBG("parent %p", parent);
 
-       local_bh_disable();
        list_for_each_safe(p, n, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q) {
                sk = (struct sock *) list_entry(p, struct bt_sock, accept_q);
 
-               bh_lock_sock(sk);
+               lock_sock(sk);
 
                /* FIXME: Is this check still needed */
                if (sk->sk_state == BT_CLOSED) {
-                       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+                       release_sock(sk);
                        bt_accept_unlink(sk);
                        continue;
                }
                        if (newsock)
                                sock_graft(sk, newsock);
 
-                       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
-                       local_bh_enable();
+                       release_sock(sk);
                        return sk;
                }
 
-               bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+               release_sock(sk);
        }
-       local_bh_enable();
 
        return NULL;
 }