crypto: deadlock between crypto_alg_sem/rtnl_mutex/genl_mutex

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:44:10AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> Yes, please.
> Disregarding some reports is not a good way long term.

Please try this patch.

---8<---
Subject: netlink: Annotate nlk cb_mutex by protocol

Currently all occurences of nlk->cb_mutex are annotated by lockdep
as a single class.  This causes a false lcokdep cycle involving
genl and crypto_user.

This patch fixes it by dividing cb_mutex into individual classes
based on the netlink protocol.  As genl and crypto_user do not
use the same netlink protocol this breaks the false dependency
loop.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 7b73c7c161a9680b8691a712c31073b7789620f7..596eaff66649e5955d6c0f349f062b6d8360dc2d 100644 (file)
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -96,6 +96,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nl_table);
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nl_table_wait);
 
+static struct lock_class_key nlk_cb_mutex_keys[MAX_LINKS];
+
+static const char *const nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[MAX_LINKS + 1] = {
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-1",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-USERSOCK",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-FIREWALL",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-SOCK_DIAG",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-NFLOG",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-XFRM",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-SELINUX",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-ISCSI",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-AUDIT",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-FIB_LOOKUP",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-CONNECTOR",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-NETFILTER",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-IP6_FW",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-DNRTMSG",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-KOBJECT_UEVENT",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-17",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-SCSITRANSPORT",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-ECRYPTFS",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-RDMA",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-CRYPTO",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-SMC",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-23",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-24",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-25",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-26",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-27",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-28",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-29",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-30",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-31",
+       "nlk_cb_mutex-MAX_LINKS"
+};
+
 static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk);
 static void netlink_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb);
 
@@ -585,6 +623,9 @@ static int __netlink_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
        } else {
                nlk->cb_mutex = &nlk->cb_def_mutex;
                mutex_init(nlk->cb_mutex);
+               lockdep_set_class_and_name(nlk->cb_mutex,
+                                          nlk_cb_mutex_keys + protocol,
+                                          nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[protocol]);
        }
        init_waitqueue_head(&nlk->wait);