mvpp2: remove misleading comment

Recycling in mvpp2 has gone long time ago, but two comment still refers
to it. Remove those two misleading comments as they generate confusion.

Fixes: 7ef7e1d949cd ("net: mvpp2: drop useless fields in mvpp2_bm_pool and related code")
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index 111b3b8239e1bc86e44b392eadf143731915ea09..5fea65256b9d4a0de14ba90ed53c83d1b708ee2c 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void mvpp2_rx_csum(struct mvpp2_port *port, u32 status,
        skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 }
 
-/* Reuse skb if possible, or allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */
+/* Allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */
 static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
                           struct mvpp2_bm_pool *bm_pool, int pool)
 {
@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
        phys_addr_t phys_addr;
        void *buf;
 
-       /* No recycle or too many buffers are in use, so allocate a new skb */
        buf = mvpp2_buf_alloc(port, bm_pool, &dma_addr, &phys_addr,
                              GFP_ATOMIC);
        if (!buf)