regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch
warning.

  WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
index 538478883ae29fe346c84ad0f39be22867eaf51e..2d16b9f16de73f5ce42ffb2370bba98c9bccf20b 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ static int ux500_regulator_status_print(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
        int i;
 
        /* print dump header */
-       err = seq_printf(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
+       err = seq_puts(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
        if (err < 0)
-               dev_err(dev, "seq_printf overflow\n");
+               dev_err(dev, "seq_puts overflow\n");
 
        err = seq_printf(s, "%31s : %8s : %8s\n", "current",
                "before", "after");