Notice that ignore_dl_rate_limit() need not piggy back on the
limits_changed handling to achieve its goal (which is to enforce a
frequency update before its due time).
Namely, if sugov_should_update_freq() is updated to check
sg_policy->need_freq_update and return 'true' if it is set when
sg_policy->limits_changed is not set, ignore_dl_rate_limit() may
set the former directly instead of setting the latter, so it can
avoid hitting the memory barrier in sugov_should_update_freq().
Update the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/10666429.nUPlyArG6x@rjwysocki.net
*/
smp_mb();
+ return true;
+ } else if (sg_policy->need_freq_update) {
+ /* ignore_dl_rate_limit() wants a new frequency to be found. */
return true;
}
static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
{
if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_min)
- WRITE_ONCE(sg_cpu->sg_policy->limits_changed, true);
+ sg_cpu->sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
}
static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,