shadow_lru_isolate() disables interrupts and acquires a lock.  It could
use spin_lock_irq() instead.  It also uses local_irq_enable() while it
could use spin_unlock_irq()/xa_unlock_irq().
Use proper suffix for lock/unlock in order to enable/disable interrupts
during release/acquire of a lock.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622151221.28167-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 
        /* Coming from the list, invert the lock order */
        if (!xa_trylock(&mapping->i_pages)) {
-               spin_unlock(lru_lock);
+               spin_unlock_irq(lru_lock);
                ret = LRU_RETRY;
                goto out;
        }
                                 workingset_lookup_update(mapping));
 
 out_invalid:
-       xa_unlock(&mapping->i_pages);
+       xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
        ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
 out:
-       local_irq_enable();
        cond_resched();
-       local_irq_disable();
-       spin_lock(lru_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(lru_lock);
        return ret;
 }