x86/retpoline: Avoid retpolines for built-in __init functions

There's no point in building init code with retpolines, since it runs before
any potentially hostile userspace does. And before the retpoline is actually
ALTERNATIVEd into place, for much of it.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: karahmed@amazon.de
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517484441-1420-2-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk

diff --git a/include/linux/init.h b/include/linux/init.h
index ea1b31101d9e32fad9a134d6f1444d6f68bd6b73..506a9815113159651da4b98ec5d72700dbe6271f 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/init.h
+++ b/include/linux/init.h
@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
+/* Built-in __init functions needn't be compiled with retpoline */
+#if defined(RETPOLINE) && !defined(MODULE)
+#define __noretpoline __attribute__((indirect_branch("keep")))
+#else
+#define __noretpoline
+#endif
+
 /* These macros are used to mark some functions or 
  * initialized data (doesn't apply to uninitialized data)
  * as `initialization' functions. The kernel can take this
@@ -40,7 +47,7 @@
 
 /* These are for everybody (although not all archs will actually
    discard it in modules) */
-#define __init         __section(.init.text) __cold  __latent_entropy
+#define __init         __section(.init.text) __cold  __latent_entropy __noretpoline
 #define __initdata     __section(.init.data)
 #define __initconst    __section(.init.rodata)
 #define __exitdata     __section(.exit.data)