In allocate_trace_buffer() the following code:
buf->buffer = ring_buffer_alloc_range(size, rb_flags, 0,
tr->range_addr_start,
tr->range_addr_size,
struct_size(tscratch, entries, 128));
tscratch = ring_buffer_meta_scratch(buf->buffer, &scratch_size);
setup_trace_scratch(tr, tscratch, scratch_size);
Has undefined behavior if ring_buffer_alloc_range() fails because
"scratch_size" is not initialize. If the allocation fails, then
buf->buffer will be NULL. The ring_buffer_meta_scratch() will return
NULL immediately if it is passed a NULL buffer and it will not update
scratch_size. Then setup_trace_scratch() will return immediately if
tscratch is NULL.
Although there's no real issue here, but it is considered undefined
behavior to pass an uninitialized variable to a function as input, and
UBSan may complain about it.
Just initialize scratch_size to zero to make the code defined behavior and
a little more robust.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/44c5deaa-b094-4852-90f9-52f3fb10e67a@stanley.mountain/
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>