mm: memory-failure: minor cleanup for comments and codestyle

Fix some wrong function names and grammar error in comments. Also remove
unneeded space after for_each_process. No functional change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230711055016.2286677-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 44a0ce3849f38021463fc1e5a7564ea1a0a44684..36529f3c6554a24768b90291b07da7d0594ea5c0 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
 
        pgoff = page_to_pgoff(page);
        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-       for_each_process (tsk) {
+       for_each_process(tsk) {
                struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
                struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
 
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
                        /*
                         * Send early kill signal to tasks where a vma covers
                         * the page but the corrupted page is not necessarily
-                        * mapped it in its pte.
+                        * mapped in its pte.
                         * Assume applications who requested early kill want
                         * to be informed of all such data corruptions.
                         */
@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(mf_mutex);
  * detected by a background scrubber)
  *
  * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts
- * enabled and no spinlocks hold.
+ * enabled and no spinlocks held.
  *
  * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error,
  *         -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
@@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ try_again:
                 * otherwise it may race with THP split.
                 * And the flag can't be set in get_hwpoison_page() since
                 * it is called by soft offline too and it is just called
-                * for !MF_COUNT_INCREASE.  So here seems to be the best
+                * for !MF_COUNT_INCREASED.  So here seems to be the best
                 * place.
                 *
                 * Don't need care about the above error handling paths for
@@ -2578,10 +2578,10 @@ static bool isolate_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist)
 
        /*
         * If we succeed to isolate the page, we grabbed another refcount on
-        * the page, so we can safely drop the one we got from get_any_pages().
+        * the page, so we can safely drop the one we got from get_any_page().
         * If we failed to isolate the page, it means that we cannot go further
         * and we will return an error, so drop the reference we got from
-        * get_any_pages() as well.
+        * get_any_page() as well.
         */
        put_page(page);
        return isolated;