...otherwise, we end up with the list ordering wrong. Currently, it's
not a problem since we skip RC_INPROG entries, but keeping the ordering
strict will be necessary for a later patch that adds a cache cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
 static void
 lru_put_end(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
 {
+       rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
        list_move_tail(&rp->c_lru, &lru_head);
 }
 
        rpc_set_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr, rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)));
        rp->c_prot = proto;
        rp->c_vers = vers;
-       rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
 
        hash_refile(rp);
+       lru_put_end(rp);
 
        /* release any buffer */
        if (rp->c_type == RC_REPLBUFF) {
 found_entry:
        /* We found a matching entry which is either in progress or done. */
        age = jiffies - rp->c_timestamp;
-       rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
        lru_put_end(rp);
 
        rtn = RC_DROPIT;
        rp->c_secure = rqstp->rq_secure;
        rp->c_type = cachetype;
        rp->c_state = RC_DONE;
-       rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
        spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
        return;
 }